Authors

The Email Delivery Guru

Co-Reg That Doesn’t Stink?

Monday, December 8, 2008 by Al Iverson

Over on his blog, John Levine talks up Co-Registration rights and wrongs. He proposes an interesting concept – if there’s a single point of opt-in, there should be a single point of opt-out. If one entity manages and handles the sharing of your opt-in data to third parties, as is often the case in co-registration situations, then it should be just as easy to tell that original party, “I’m done. I don’t want any more mail from any one of your partners – anyone you gave my address to. Go make it happen.” I like that, it’s not a bad idea.

What’s even better is to not utilize what I call indirect or loose co-registration. When you sign up on a site, and the site informs you they’re going to give your email address to trusted third-parties, that’s not even really co-registration. That’s selling lists. And buying those lists doesn’t work – it drives spam complaints and blocking. It’s exactly the kind of thing that results in me and my team spending countless hours helping a client repair their broken sending reputation, helping the climb out of the spam folder and back to the inbox.

Direct co-registration is far less problematic. That’s a scenario wherein a site explicitly asks a registrant if they want mail from company X, Y or Z, and then, if the registrant only agrees to mail from company X, only company X is given the registrant’s email address. Sounds like opt-in to me.

I do have to wonder though, does co-registration ever work? Is it ever a solid way to build an email list? I know, from the deliverability side of things, that there are a lot of pitfalls. A lot of ways to do it wrong, and if you do it wrong, you end up with a deliverability problem. On the marketing side, I recall Morgan Stewart, our director of research, pointing out that a couple of years ago that during multiple tests, co-reg simply doesn’t work from a marketing ROI perspective.

What’s changed since then? If anything, recipients are touchier about spam. They are more likely to report you as a spammer, and they’re able to do so more easily than they were a couple years ago. Co-reg strikes me as even riskier, and less likely to succeed, than it was a couple years ago. What do you think?

Comments for Co-Reg That Doesn’t Stink?

Wednesday, December 10, 2008 by Susan Beebe:
Al, Great post! Co-registration only works well when a consumer’s online marketing preferences can be managed for privacy and subscriptions in an integrated way. Once the consumer “Opts-in” to sharing of their private data with other “partners”, then the consumer has just allowed their data to be “sold” as you wisely noted. And the consumer will then lose control of their private data; that is, the consumer will not be able to later go back to the original website and fine tune their preferences as their information has now been broadcast to potentially many diverse and separate “partner” systems. Now in to control one’s preferences, that disenchanted consumer would then have know the names of each “partners” website so the consumer could successfully go remove themselves from those systems that their data was “sold” to … very messy! In the end, the consumer is not going to be very pleased with this arrangement. Susan

Leave a comment





Captcha