Gmail's Priority Inbox: Doomsday for Email Marketing?

Posted by: Phil Schott
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Doomsday for Email MarketingGmail's Priority Inbox isn't doomsday for email marketing for several reasons. First, it's got to be widely adopted and it's too early to tell just how many are going to adopt.

Second, it simply reinforces what we've been telling senders for years--get permission, be relevant, offer value, on and on. Now, unless you're doing what we've been telling you for years your mail could be relegated to the bottom of the barrel. (That is if anyone adopts Priority Inbox)

Third, in practice priority inbox has already been happening for years. What do you look for first when you open your email?...
Read More »

Maximize Email Marketing Deliverability

Posted by: Phil Schott
Thursday, July 22, 2010
I'm always surprised when I hear the following from a client: "Well, our revenue's off a bit off so we decided that we'd email to our entire database including really old addresses and some addresses we're not sure how we acquired.  I knew it'd cause problems and I told them it would, but my boss, the (insert big title here), said we had to do it."
 
Deliverability LogosIf you ever find yourself in that position and the boss isn't listening to you, hopefully they'll believe the message from experts at Yahoo, Earthlink, McAfee, ReturnPath, and elsewhere who contributed to our latest whitepaper, Letters to the... Read More »

More compelling emails are better than an incentive

Posted by: Phil Schott
Monday, January 11, 2010

I'm not a fan of offering incentives to entice folks to sign up for email programs.  Why?  Because you're bound to have folks sign up who are only, or more, interested in your incentive than they are in getting your email.

The subscriber signs up, gets the free swag and then they do one of the following:

1.  Unsubscribe
2.  Unsubscribe by hitting the "spam" button
3.  Stay on your list, but don't ever open, click, or convert
4.  Stay on your list and become the bestest, most engaged subscriber EVER!

One, two, and three are more likely to be the case, in my experience.

Admittedly, I don't have any...

Read More »

Take Responsibility for Your Deliverability

Posted by: Phil Schott
Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Taking responsibility for one's deliverability is something every sender should logically do.  Not only is it in your best interest as a sender, but there are many variables that are beyond anyone else's control but the sender's.

The sender typically provides the method of opt-in for subscribers, builds the emails and communications, loads subscriber lists into ExactTarget, segments subscriber data, and hits the "send" button.  Seems to me that the party responsible for the aforementioned, the sender, has a vested interest in monitoring how all that hard work pays off.

Not monitoring your...

Read More »

Project Honey Pot Receives their 1 Billionth Spam Message

Posted by: Phil Schott
Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Project Honey Pot describes themselves as, "...the first and only distributed system for identifying spammers and the spambots they use to scrape addresses from your website."

Basically they're one of the good guys trying to rid the world of spammers by detecting and exposing them through the use of spamtraps.

On Wednesday, December 9, 2009, they received their billionth spam email message.  To mark this momentous occasion they reviewed five years worth of data and shared some of their findings, including:
 

  • Monday is the busiest day of the week for email spam, Saturday is the quietest
  • 12:00 (GMT)...
Read More »

Sometimes We Are Our Own Worst (Email Marketing) Enemy

Posted by: Phil Schott
Thursday, December 10, 2009

I read a great post today by Ken Magill entitled, Let's Play the Email Blame Game!

As usual, Mr. Magill's material is frank and sensibly presents the notion, dare I say fact, that bad things happen when you stray from email marketing and deliverability best practices.  And, wait for it...  Often, there's no one to blame but yourself.

Amongst the cardinal sins mentioned in the post is that dusting off the house file and sending to really old addresses will get you into trouble.

Although not mentioned in the post, another holiday treat for receivers (and subscribers) is the thought that if...

Read More »

What is an acceptable number of spam complaints?

Posted by: Phil Schott
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
I was working with a client today who asked what an acceptable number or rate of spam complaints was and thought I'd share my response.

The goal should be to send mail that subscribers aren't going to complain about.  Send mail that subscribers have signed up for and want to receive.

Despite best efforts and the best and most engaged subscribers, it's highly unlikely that no subscribers will complain about a campaign that's sent.  That's just part of email marketing.  We understand that and so do receivers which is why some of them publish complaint rate thresholds.

What's acceptable then?  We...Read More »

Sending SMS Messages? Make Sure You are in Compliance with New SMS Regulations.

Posted by: Phil Schott
Friday, October 2, 2009

If you're an ExactTarget client using SMS to enable targeted 1 to 1 communications you should have received an email on October 1, 2009, informing you of a change to industry regulations.

Here's what the email stated:

Beginning October 1, 2009, industry regulations state that the phrase "Standard Message charges apply" is no longer acceptable as standard messaging in SMS communications. For all digital advertising formats and message flows, one of the following phrases must be used in its place:

Message and Data Rates May Apply
Msg&Data Rates May Apply
Msg&data rates may apply
Msg&data rates may...

Read More »

Recurring Comcast Delivery Problems Don't Have to be a Problem

Posted by: Phil Schott
Tuesday, September 15, 2009

One of the most frequent questions that we in Deliverability Services get asked is how to keep Comcast blocking from recurring.

Comcast aggressively blocks mail they deem their users don't want--even more so than other receivers.  Right or wrong, they have filtering in place that they believe is effective and offers their users maximum protection from spam and unwanted mail.  Ultimately, their obligation is to meet the needs of their users and not necessarily to meet the needs of senders.

The two biggest reasons Comcast blocks mail is because a sender's mail earns too many complaints or because...

Read More »

As with Email Marketing, Voicemail Marketing Requires Permission Also

Posted by: Phil Schott
Wednesday, May 20, 2009

If you haven't heard, in addition to email and SMS marketing, ExactTarget also offers voicemail marketing

While I'm well versed in permission practices regarding email, I didn't know too much about how permission applies to voicemail marketing.  So, I attended Vontoo's Permission-Based Voice Marketing Webinar recently to learn more.  I picked up some valuable information I thought was worth sharing.

Just as email marketing is governed by the CAN-SPAM law, voice marketing here in the United States is regulated by the Federal Trade Commission's Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR).

Today, the TSR...

Read More »

Do you know who's on your list?

Posted by: Phil Schott
Monday, January 26, 2009

Lately I've been receiving marketing emails from a large marketing advocacy group.  The problem is, I don't recall signing up for them.  However, given my line of work and ExactTarget's likely association with this group, it's not beyond the realm of possibility that they would send me messages.  So, I've been unsubscribing from the messages using the included unsubscribe link.

Yet, I keep receiving more messages from them.  Odd.  It appears that every time I unsubscribed from one of the five emails I've received that it was from a different list of theirs.

I happened to Twitter about my...

Read More »