Authors

Focus on the Fundamentals

No Means No

Monday, February 16, 2009 by Nate Romance
I recently booked a trip on a online travel website that I had not previously used. I'm usually pretty loyal when it comes to my favorite online travel company, but I wanted to do some research on differences in customer service and email practices across the industry, so I booked a trip on this 'other' site. My email experience during this process was not positive, but is certainly blogworthy.

As a first time user of the site, I was asked if I wanted to create an account. I have enough usernames and passwords to remember, so I declined. So that was their first attempt to add me to their ongoing mailing list, and I declined.

As a guest trip booker, I was prompted to provide my email address during the checkout process so I could receive my confirmation email. It was a required field, so I obliged. I then noticed the little pre-checked box that had me signed up for ongoing promotional emails. Now usually I just would've left that checked. Since my job is email and I work with a client in the travel industry (not this one), it makes sense to know what other companies in the space are sending. For some reason, I decided to uncheck the box, so I basically opted-out of receiving ongoing promotional email. I think I wanted to make sure that this company would actually honor this preference and only send me transactional emails about my trip. This is their second attempt to add me to their ongoing mailing list, and I declined.

I received my confirmation email with my itinerary later that night. They had a call to action in the the confirmation email, stating the benefits of opting in to ongoing email. As and email strategist, I actually like the fact that they put this in their confirmation email. I still didn't want to opt-in, so I didn't click on that link. This is their third attempt to add me to their ongoing mailing list, and I declined.

So I figured that would be the end of it. They had three shots, and I declined each of their attempts. If that was the end of it, I'd consider it to be a fairly aggressive strategy, but nothing that crosses the line into a bad practice or overly-annoying. These first three steps are pretty standard in this industry. Unfortunately, it didn't end there.

Three days later, I received another email. The subject line was "Welcome to [company name]! Thanks for your recent booking." Based on the envelope fields, this smelled like a welcome email. Sort of weird since I actually unchecked the box about receiving ongoing emails, so why the heck would they send me a welcome email? So I opened the email, and the entire thing was about trying to get me to sign up for ongoing emails. This was attempt #4. What annoyed me the most was the headline, which said something like "Thanks for your business, but we think you forgot something." The 'something' that they think I 'forgot' is opting in for their promotional emails. This was super annoying because it's not like they were using explicit (unchecked) opt-in at registration. I actually took the time to uncheck their little box, so to put it on me and act like I made a mistake took me from general annoyance to cursing at my laptop.

I guess the moral of the story here is that it's never a bad idea to provide multiple opportunities to opt in during checkout and even in the confirmation email sending process. Sending a follow up email that talks down to your not-opted in customer is just annoying and disrespectful to a first time customer. I'll be getting off my soapbox now and back to using my favorite online travel company from now on. 

Blago and the Billboard Email Effect

Wednesday, January 28, 2009 by Nate Romance
 As a former Illinois resident, I've been playing close attention to the Gov. Blagojevich soap opera. As an employee who works from home, I spend a great deal of time watching television. These two forces created a perfect storm yesterday. 

Blago is on some kind of press junket usually reserved for movie stars. I had breakfast with Blago on The Today Show, I had lunch with Blago on CNN. I capped it off with a late dinner with Blago on the Rachel Maddow show. This got me thinking about the similarities between Blago and email marketers. More exposure is not necessarily a good thing.

I often debate email frequency with email marketers. One marketer actually told me that they considered an unopened, unclicked email to be a net positive for their brand. If you think there is any truth to the statement above, please repeat after me:

Email is not broadcast media
Email is not the same as a banner ad
Email is not a digital billboard
Email is not cheap paper
Email IS a medium for targeted, one to one communication with your customers and prospects.

Don't just send email to be top of mind with your customers. Sending too frequently just to win a king of the inbox battle with your competitors is not a net positive for you or your brand - it actually has the opposite effect. There is a time to be front and center, and there is a time to sit back and respect your audience's privacy. Yeah, I'm talking to you too, Blago. 

Exhibit A is my mom. She's a little more tech savvy than the typical 63 year old grandmother. She has an unhealthy addiction to Craigslist and Amazon, but we're working through that. Anyway, she is comfortable with making purchases online and is frequently added to the mailing lists of the stores where she makes purchases. 

This past weekend I went to visit her and she was in her chair, looking at the warm glow of her laptop. She said "if they send me one more stupid email this week, I'm never going to buy anything from them again." And she was using her 'mom' voice. The one I haven't heard in quite some time. I think she was taking it out on me because I work with email marketers. The company in question was a specialty popcorn retailer. She purchases from them once a year (for my sister's birthday) and gets 3-5 emails per week from this company. Instead of looking at what they are gaining by sending so frequently, this company should probably be looking at what they are losing from this practice. It's a tough sell to convince a marketer that sending less can lead to increased sales, but they should also look at how sending more can cost you loyal customers and brand evangelists. 

Just like content, there is no one size fits all frequency in a one-to-one world. Adjusting frequency based on previous purchase behavior shows that you understand your customers, you respect them, and you'll be there for them when they're ready. 

Raccoons in your Subject Line

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 by Nate Romance
 As an Email Strategist, I spend a lot of time analyzing all of the emails that I receive. I sign up for just about every email marketing program that I can find. I get ideas from retailers and email marketers from around the globe. The inspiration for this post actually came from my own neighborhood. 

The president of my neighborhood association communicates with me and my neighbors via email. I realize that this isn't really email marketing, but many of the principals and best practices are the same. One of the recent targeted emails that she sent had the subject line "Community breakfast meeting scheduled and rabid racoon found in White Oak." Instead of locking my doors or double-checking my dog's vaccination records, I decided to critique the subject line and come up with some new subject line best practices:

1. First things first. While I'm sure the community breakfast meeting is important, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that most people are probably more interested in the rabid raccoon that is on the loose. Most people are going to read your subject line from left to right, so I'd lead with the rabid raccoon.

2. Spell check = Good. I'll cut the association president a little slack here, as I'm sure that her mind was racing with the thought of the rabid raccoon. That said, there are two c's and two o's in raccoon. Whether it's a diseased mammal or a fast-approaching deadline, we all face pressures that lead to careless mistakes. Take the time to spell check both your email content and your subject line before you send your message.

3. Length Matters. While there's no true standardization among ISPs and email clients, a good rule of thumb is to keep your subject line under 50 characters in length. If I was reading the neighborhood association subject line on a blackberry or in my Hotmail account, the subject line would've been cut off before the rabid raccoon. I would have just deleted the email, thinking it was entirely about a community breakfast meeting.

Following these three basic subject line best practices can really help your email program. Good luck with your subject lines, and be on the lookout for rabid raccoons.